June 30, 2024

In the Lakers’ exciting victory over the Warriors, LeBron James and Stephen Curry played their hearts out.

On Saturday night at the Chase Center, LeBron James — the oldest player in the NBA — set a career-high with 20 rebounds, became the first Los Angeles Lakers player to drop a 30-20-10 triple-double since Kareem Abdul-Jabbar in 1976, and led his team to a 145-144 double-overtime win over Stephen Curry and the Golden State Warriors.

The increasingly resilient Lakers clawed back from a 15-point deficit. James was flanked by a hobbled Anthony Davis (45 minutes, 29 points, 13 rebounds), D’Angelo Russell (49 minutes, 29 points), Austin Reaves (47 minutes, 17 points, six assists), and Jarred Vanderbilt (14 points, nine rebounds, five assists, four steals, +30) — all of whom eclipsed 40 minutes and played the vast majority of crunch- and extra-time.

In 48 minutes, the 39-year-old tallied 36 points on 14-for-25 shooting, to go along with the 20 boards and 12 assists. His clutch free throws with 1.2 seconds left — resulting from a hard paint attack — put the Lakers in front, once and for all (he missed a runner at the end of OT).

“I’m very thankful that I get to coach him,” said Darvin Ham, who called the win a “shot in the arm” for his 24-23 ballclub. (Vanderbilt expressed similar sentiments).

Curry poured in 46 points, highlighted by a dazzling layup around Davis to force overtime and an array of clutch buckets in overtime. His triple with 5.9 seconds put the Warriors up one before LeBron’s response.

“How does it keep getting better,” LeBron could be heard telling Curry on the court.

The subtext became the text throughout this thriller. Ostensibly, this game is about the Lakers beating the Warriors — two marquee West foes seeking consistency and play-in positioning — and the countless decisions and bounces that produced a one-point margin.

Beyond the 2023-24 context, though, this instant classic served as a never-unwelcome reminder to appreciate these two intertwined icons, whose remaining showdowns are, theoretically, numbered.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *